last updated: May 5, 2003
A couple of years ago I became aware that ordinary people have been using currency to spread ideas.
I had received a few I GREW HEMP bills, but was awhile before it dawned on me that people were actually using cash as a communication channel.
Some bills advertise political opinions. Others share highly personal messages, I suppose many of which are in-jokes. And some are probably just artistic creations.
But why did these people select legal tender to convey their messages? Here are my pet theories:
They are trying to reach a very wide audience.
First of all, money is inherently valuable. So no matter how obnoxious or antithetical the statement on the bill may be, you're still going to spend it. Unlike a poster or flyer, which you would simply discard. (In the advertising world, the dollar bill would be considered a durable medium.) And once you put the bill back into circulation, it is likely to change hands dozens or hundreds of times.
And currency itself knows no socio-economic boundaries. Everybody makes cash purchases, receives more cash in change. Even people who don't read the newspaper, listen to the radio, or watch television. Regardless of age, gender, religion, or ethnicity, everybody handles cash. Therefore, your message could reach people who would never have received it any other way.
They are trying to be anonymous.
I have never seen a stamped bill which identified its sender.
(I suppose if you count the Where's George? bills as having identifiable senders, then yes I have run across a couple of those. But I think the Where's George? phenomenon is a slightly different subject.)
Perhaps one reason nobody signs their work is that it's technically a federal crime to adulterate US currency. I am no lawyer, but I think it's only a crime if the alteration interferes with the usage of that currency. For instance, I suppose if you stamped a large design on the back of a bill and it was no longer accepted by vending machines, that would be a crime.
They are trying to make a point about purchasing power.
This only applies in certain cases.
Sometimes a group will mount a campaign to illustrate their combined buying power. One way to do this would be to stamp money with your group affiliation. Everybody receiving that money would then realize the economic contribution of that group.
I have heard of pending military base closures begetting stamped bills with the base's name on them. I have never actually seen one of these bills, however.
I should point out that if you wanted to mount a demonstration of consumer spending power, you don't need to stamp bills. You could urge your membership to deal in unusual tender, like $2 bills or Susan B. Anthony dollar coins. But then you'd also have to publicize your campaign, or else shopkeepers would just be puzzled at the weird denominations coming in. In that regard, stamped bills are preferable because they are self-explanatory.
|
|
The phrase IN GOD WE TRUST was added to U.S. currency in 1955, much to the dismay of many atheists. In fact, there is an organized campaign afoot to remove the message. Specimen collected in Los Angeles, 2001. |
|
|
I would expect this PRO ABORTION message to be intended as a call to arms, rather than an evangelizing attempt. Specimen collected 2001. |
|
|
The TRAWLER DOLLAR -- another spending power campaign? Image courtesy of Kristian Jaech, Steilacoom, WA. |
|
|
The WHERE IS MY DADDY? bill conveys unmistakable support for the Men's Rights movement. Image courtesy of Kristian Jaech, Steilacoom, WA. |
|
|
Given the mindnumbingly close 2000 election, the BUSH IS A FRAUD bill was probably inevitable. Specimen collected in San Francisco, 2001. |
|
|
The IMPEACH BUSH bill is another in the same vein. Specimen collected in San Jose, February 2002. |
|
|
The ANTI-LORENZO twenty was the first large denomination specimen in my collection.
Which is interesting, because stamping a $20 bill costs the same as stamping a $1 bill. After all, you still get to spend the money. So why do people prefer to stamp $1 bills? Well, maybe people are stamping twenties and hundreds, but they aren't circulating as quickly as the ones. Or perhaps the stamp activity occurs only sporadically, with whatever cash happens to be on-hand (most of which being ones). One theory on the message: maybe this is protesting the former airline union-buster Frank Lorenzo. However, the bill is series 1995, which places the act of stamping at least two years after Lorenzo was kicked out of the airline industry. Needless to say, I am eager to hear other explanations. |
|
|
This ANTI-WTO bill was discovered in Seattle during the first anniversary of the WTO protests there. |
|
|
I don't know precisely how or why I'm supposed to STOP STARBUCKS!, but I suppose there's only so much room on a dollar bill. |
|
|
The ROTTEN.COM bill: what I suppose is the only piece of advertising in my collection... |
|
|
...unless you count religious proselytizing as advertising. If you haven't heard of JOHN 3:16, then you don't watch enough televised sports. (Not to be nitpicky, but the word "that" is missing from the quotation. If you don't believe me, look for yourself.) |
Other links...
Someone else's stamped money collection. Descriptions only (no images). Excerpted without permission from the newsletter of the Texas Numismatics Association.
This is my favorite stamped money idea I've run across. Done as an art project.
An atheist in Oregon was (is?) stamping bills to obliterate the phrase IN GOD WE TRUST.
A campaign to demonstrate the buying power of gun owners.
Apparently, during WW2 the federal government stamped Hawaiian dollars in case the Japanese ever occupied the state. (There's an act of pessimism for you.)
A fascinating portion of the US Secret Service website.
Johnny Burrito's collection of altered bills.